fieldwork.example
Audit a pageShareThe verdict
What this page is ready for, and what to do next.Mixed readiness. Citability and E-E-A-T rows usually carry the most weight here.
Key takeaway (AI)The page can be read by most crawlers, but thin content, invalid structured data and a blocked OpenAI search crawler limit what AI systems can quote.
Do these three first
All 25 actions →Summary
AI synthesisFieldwork’s homepage reaches search engines and most AI crawlers, and its main text is server-rendered. The one access exception is OAI-SearchBot, which robots.txt disallows (ACC-04); ChatGPT search cannot fetch the page while that rule stands.
Content is the weakest area. The main text has about fifty words and only one block long enough to score (EAT-05, CIT-01), so there is little for an assistant to quote. Structured data is present but the Organization JSON-LD does not parse because of a trailing comma (S08), which also leaves the entity undeclared (SCH-06).
Technical foundations are mostly sound. The gaps are a missing meta description (S05), an image without alt text (S09), no charset declaration (HTML-02), no HSTS header (SEC-02) and no cache validators (PERF-11).
Start with the robots rule and the JSON-LD syntax, then expand the content into headed sections with concrete facts.
Where the score comes from
weighted mean of six categoriesPlatform readiness
Derived from the checks each platform relies on. Not a visibility prediction.5 platforms206 catalog rows · 13 agent observations · rules geo-new-rules-v11. Scores describe measured checks; they do not predict rankings or AI citations.